Editing
Functional: Urinary Incontinence
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Other === * Circumstances that warrant consideration of supplemental evaluation: *# Inability to establish a diagnosis based on the patient’s symptoms and initial evaluation *# Concomitant overactive bladder symptoms *# Prior lower urinary tract surgery including anti-incontinence surgery *# Known or suspected neurogenic bladder *# Negative stress test *# Abnormal urinalysis (e.g. unexplained hematuria or pyruia) *# Elevated postvoid residual *# High-grade (stage ≥3) pelvic prolapse *# Evidence of dysfunctional voiding ==== Symptom quantification instruments ==== * Voiding diaries can provide both diagnostic and therapeutic advantages. ** The use of diaries often helps patients realized their pattern of urination and is more accurate than recall. Furthermore, the diary can provide patients with insights into those behaviors that can be altered to decrease urinary frequency. * '''3-day voiding diary offers the same information as a 7-day one without being too exhaustive for patients''' ==== Questionnaires ==== * Several validated questionnaires exist, including the International Consultation on Incontinence questionnaire short form (ICIQ-SF). * Both the voiding diary and the quality of life questionnaire not only help in the assessment of patients but also help in looking at treatment effects if repeated after the same patient has been treated ==== Postvoid residual ==== * No established volumes that define normal or impaired emptying ==== Cystoscopy ==== * Routine cystoscopy is not advocated in the evaluation of uncomplicated urinary incontinence ** Cystoscopy should be considered in patients with ***Urinary urgency ***Hematuria ***Other irritative symptoms ***History of anti-incontinence procedure, pelvic radiation, or pelvic prolapse repair. ==== Urodynamics ==== * '''Should only be performed when it is going to change the management of the patient''' ** Consider UDS in patients who are ***Considering invasive, potentially morbid or irreversible surgery ***Have failed previous pelvic floor reconstruction ***Have mixed incontinence, urinary urgency, or obstructive symptoms ***Patients who have elevated PVRs or neurologic disease. * Multichannel UDS offers an extensive evaluation of LUT function. ** The degree of accuracy provided by multichannel UDS is important in a variety of circumstances, including: *** Conservative treatment methods fail *** Diagnosis is unclear *** Previous diagnostic procedures are inconclusive *** Clinical pictures complicated by radiation therapy, neurologic disease, or prior failed pelvic floor reconstruction or antiincontinence surgery *** Symptoms that cannot be confirmed by the clinician. * One important scenario that can occur during urodynamics is cough-induced detrusor overactivity incontinence, which happens when the patient coughs and this action initiates an involuntary detrusor contraction, and the patient leaks because of the detrusor overactivity contraction rather than because of the raised intra-adominal pressure generated by the cough. Clinically, it sounds as if the patient is leaking because of SUI, whereas the urodynamics show that he has cough-induced detrusor overactivity. * '''Occult SUI is SUI unmasked by reduction of prolapse; 11-50% of clinically continent patients will develop de novo SUI after repair of high-grade prolapse.''' * '''Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) trial''' ** '''Population: women with SUI undergoing sacrocolpopexy for prolapse''' ** '''Randomized to concomitant Burch colposuspension vs. no concomitant procedure''' ** '''Results''' *** Premature termination of trial after the first interim analysis at 3 months which showed '''significant reduction in SUI in patient undergoing Burch vs. control''' (24% vs. 44%) ==== Pad tests ==== * Can be helpful in quantifying leakage * Tedious and cumbersome; generally used for academic purposes. ** Most guidelines have not recommended the use of pad testing. ** Many investigators advocate for pad tests in clinical trials, because pad tests can provide objective, precise information for assessment of actual volume of urine lost over an established period. ** The International Continence Society recommends both a 3-day bladder diary and pad weight test as proper measures for symptom quantification in incontinence research. * '''Urine loss >1.3g is considered a positive 24-hour pad test, whereas others consider up to 8g of urine loss in 24 hours to be normal''' ** '''Vaginal secretions should be taken into consideration, although the volume attributable to normal vaginal secretions may be as low as 0.3g in 24 hours'''. ==== Dye testing in females ==== * '''Can be helpful to verify that the leakage represents urine versus another fluid such as vaginal discharge or peritoneal fluid and to substantiate the diagnosis of urinary tract fistulae.''' * '''Oral phenazopyridine''' (100-200mg three times per day)''', also known as pyridium, colors the urine orange, and this simple test can confirm that the leakage fluid is indeed urine.''' * '''Diagnosis of a vesicovaginal or urethrovaginal fistula can be supported by blue or orange staining of an intravaginal tampon after intravesical instillation of methylene blue or pyridium dissolved in sterile water or saline.''' * '''<span style="color:#ff0000">In the case of a suspected ureterovaginal fistula, intravesical methylene blue with concurrent oral phenazopyridine (pyridium) can elucidate the fistula location based on the staining pattern on the vaginal tampon</span>''' ** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Orange staining suggests a ureteral communication</span>''' ** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Blue staining suggests a bladder communication</span>''' ** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Simultaneous vesicovaginal and ureterovaginal fistulae can occur.</span>'''
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information