Editing
AUA: Stone Surgery (2016)
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Symptomatic === * '''Total stone burden β€20mm''' ** '''Non-lower pole stone''' *** '''Recommended options: SWL or URS''' **** '''Treatment options for patients with a <20 mm non-lower pole renal stone burden include SWL, URS, and PCNL'''. Of these, PCNL stone-free rates are the least affected by stone size, while stone-free rates of both SWL and URS decline with increasing stone burden. However, '''for stone burdens <20mm, stone-free rates of both URS and SWL are acceptable and have less morbidity compared to PCNL'''. ** '''Lower pole stone''' *** '''β€ 10 mm''' **** '''Recommended options: SWL or URS''' ***** An RCT found that there was no significant difference between the stone-free rates with URS vs. SWL. Intraoperative complications were higher with URS, and patient-derived QoL measures were better with SWL in this trial. ***** '''CT imaging parameters should be used for patient selection.''' *** '''> 10mm''' **** '''Recommended options: PCNL (preferred) or URS; SWL not recommended''' ***** '''Clinicians should inform patients with lower pole stones >10 mm in size that PCNL has a higher stone-free rate but greater morbidity [than URS].''' ***** '''PCNL should be considered the primary treatment''' * '''Stone burden > 20 mm''' ** '''Recommended options: PCNL (first-line) or URS (option); SWL not recommended as first-line''' *** Significantly reduced stone-free rates and increased need for multiple treatments for SWL compared to PCNL for patients with a total renal stone burden > 20 mm **** Success of SWL is dependent on several other factors, including obesity, skin-to-stone distance, collecting system anatomy, stone composition and stone density/attenuation, which could also contribute to lower stone-free rates **** The benefit of a higher stone-free rate must be weighed against the increased invasiveness and risk of complications for PCNL compared to URS or SWL. ***** 15% overall complication rate with PNCL, majority categorized as Clavien Grade I. '''Bleeding necessitating blood transfusion (7%) is the most common complication''' **** The risk of ureteral obstruction from stone fragments (steinstrasse) increases * '''Staghorn calculi''' ** '''PCNL is the first-line treatment'''
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information