Editing
Functional: Urinary Incontinence
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Urodynamics ==== * '''Should only be performed when it is going to change the management of the patient''' ** Consider UDS in patients who are ***Considering invasive, potentially morbid or irreversible surgery ***Have failed previous pelvic floor reconstruction ***Have mixed incontinence, urinary urgency, or obstructive symptoms ***Patients who have elevated PVRs or neurologic disease. * Multichannel UDS offers an extensive evaluation of LUT function. ** The degree of accuracy provided by multichannel UDS is important in a variety of circumstances, including: *** Conservative treatment methods fail *** Diagnosis is unclear *** Previous diagnostic procedures are inconclusive *** Clinical pictures complicated by radiation therapy, neurologic disease, or prior failed pelvic floor reconstruction or antiincontinence surgery *** Symptoms that cannot be confirmed by the clinician. * One important scenario that can occur during urodynamics is cough-induced detrusor overactivity incontinence, which happens when the patient coughs and this action initiates an involuntary detrusor contraction, and the patient leaks because of the detrusor overactivity contraction rather than because of the raised intra-adominal pressure generated by the cough. Clinically, it sounds as if the patient is leaking because of SUI, whereas the urodynamics show that he has cough-induced detrusor overactivity. * '''Occult SUI is SUI unmasked by reduction of prolapse; 11-50% of clinically continent patients will develop de novo SUI after repair of high-grade prolapse.''' * '''Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) trial''' ** '''Population: women with SUI undergoing sacrocolpopexy for prolapse''' ** '''Randomized to concomitant Burch colposuspension vs. no concomitant procedure''' ** '''Results''' *** Premature termination of trial after the first interim analysis at 3 months which showed '''significant reduction in SUI in patient undergoing Burch vs. control''' (24% vs. 44%)
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information