Editing
Functional: Female SUI
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Additional Evaluations=== *'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Should be considered for patients with the following conditions (8)</span>''': *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction</span>''' (known or suspected) *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Inability to demonstrate stress urinary incontinence</span>''' *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Inability to make definitive diagnosis based on symptoms and initial evaluation</span>''' *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Elevated post-void residual</span>''' per clinician judgment *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Evidence of significant voiding dysfunction</span>''' *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Urgency-predominant mixed urinary incontinence</span>''' *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Abnormal urinalysis,</span>''' such as unexplained hematuria or pyuria *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">High grade pelvic organ prolapse</span>''' (POP-Q stage 3 or higher) '''if SUI not demonstrated by pelvic organ prolapse reduction''' *'''May be performed in patients with:'''**Concomitant overactive bladder symptoms **Failure of prior anti-incontinence surgery **Prior pelvic prolapse surgery ====Cystoscopy==== *'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Should not be performed in index patients for the evaluation of SUI</span>''' *'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Indications (3):</span>''' *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Suspected bladder pathology</span>''' based on history or concerning findings on physical exam or urinalysis (e.g. microhematuria) *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Structural lower urinary tract abnormality</span>''' *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Patients undergoing certain surgical procedures (e.g., midurethral (MUS) or pubovaginal fascial (PVS) slings)</span> to confirm the integrity of the lower urinary tract and the absence of foreign body''' *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">History of prior anti-incontinence surgery or pelvic floor reconstruction, particularly if mesh or suture perforation is suspected</span>''' *#*'''Perforation should be suspected with new onset of lower urinary tract symptoms, hematuria, or recurrent UTI''' ==== UDS==== *'''<span style="color:#ff0000">May be omitted for the index patient desiring treatment when SUI is clearly demonstrated''' **'''<span style="color:#ff00ff">VALUE (NEJM 2012)</span>''' ***Population: 630 females with uncomplicated SUI ***Randomized to preoperative office evaluation and urodynamic tests vs. evaluation only ***Primary outcome: Treatment success at 12 months, defined as a reduction in the score on the Urogenital Distress Inventory of 70% or more and a response of “much better” or “very much better” on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement ***Results: preoperative office evaluation alone was not inferior to evaluation with urodynamic testing ***[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22551104/ Nager, Charles W., et al. "A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery." ''New England Journal of Medicine'' 366.21 (2012): 1987-1997.] *'''<span style="color:#ff0000">May be performed at the urologist’s discretion in certain non-index patients, including but not limited to (8):''' *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction</span>''' *# '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Unconfirmed SUI</span>''' *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Mismatch between subjective and objective measures</span>''' *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Elevated PVR per clinician judgment</span>''' *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Significant voiding dysfunction</span>''' *# '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Significant urgency, UUI, overactive bladder (OAB)</span>''' *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">History of prior pelvic organ prolapse surgery</span>''' *#'''<span style="color:#ff0000">History of prior anti-incontinence surgery</span>''' * '''If significant prolapse is present, UDS should be performed with and without a pessary''' * '''In patients with DO,''' '''treatment options other than sling surgery should be considered''' because stress-induced DO may be difficult to treat with a sling alone. * Abnormally small bladder capacity and decreased compliance may also negatively affect the outcomes of sling surgery, and these factors should also be considered.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information