Editing
Management of Localized Prostate Cancer
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Metastatic Staging === ====Indications ==== ===== AUA ===== *'''[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23659877/ 2023 AUA Guidelines on Early Detection of Prostate Cancer]''' **'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Asymptomatic low/intermediate-risk: staging should NOT be performed</span>''' ***May be considered for unfavorable, intermediate-risk. **'''<span style="color:#ff0000">High-risk: staging should be performed</span>''' ==== Modality[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23659877/]==== *'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Cross sectional imaging (CT or multi-parametric MRI) and bone scan should be used to stage patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, when indicated.</span>''' **For both mpMRI scan and CT scan, the assessment of nodal metastasis is based on size criteria, and these modalities have moderate sensitivity and high specificity. **To evaluate for the presence of bone metastasis, conventional bone scan should be obtained as the initial staging study. *'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Molecular imaging may be obtained to evaluate for metastases in patients with prostate cancer at high risk for metastatic disease with negative conventional imaging</span>''' **Molecular imaging is also referred to as next generation imaging (NGI) **'''Gallium 68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 (Ga 68 PSMA-11) and piflufolastat F-18 PSMA (18F-DCFPyL) PET scanning have been FDA approved for initial staging for patients at high risk of metastasis (as well as for evaluation of biochemical relapse after treatment).''' ***[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32209449/ proPSMA] (2020) was a multicenter randomized trial that compared Ga-68 PSMA PET with conventional imaging using CT scan and bone scan in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before definitive therapy and found that Ga-68 PSMA PET scan was found to have a 27% greater accuracy than conventional imaging, with better sensitivity and specificity, in the detection of nodal or distant metastasis. **Limited data to date demonstrating a clinical benefit to novel imaging modalities for patients with negative conventional imaging ***Identification of disease with molecular imaging may influence treatment (e.g., the addition of systemic therapy or metastases-directed therapy); uncertain incremental oncologic benefit of altering treatment based on the identification of metastases with molecular imaging among patients with negative conventional imaging.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information