Editing
AUA: Stone Surgery (2016)
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Pediatrics == * Overall, more generous use of SWL === Ureteral stones === * '''Uncomplicated ureteral stones β€10 mm''' ** '''Observation +/- MET using Ξ±-blockers should be offered [similar to adults]''' ** '''URS or SWL for ureteral stones who are unlikely to pass the stones or who failed observation and/or MET, based on patient-specific anatomy and body habitus [different than adults''' '''where URS preferred for distal or mid ureteric stones]''' * '''Routine stenting prior to URS for ureteral stones is not recommended [similar to adults]''' === Renal stones === * '''Active surveillance with periodic ultrasonography may be utilized in pediatric patients with asymptomatic and non-obstructing renal stones''' * '''Total renal stone burden <20mm''' ** '''Options: SWL or URS [different than adults''' where stone location is important''';''' in adults, for lower pole stone >10mm, SWL is not recommended, all other stones <20mm can be treated with URS or SWL] * '''Total renal stone burden >20mm''' ** '''Options: both PCNL and SWL are acceptable treatment options [different than adults,''' no role for SWL for total renal stone burden >20mm] *** '''A non-contrast, low-dose CT scan should be obtained prior to PCNL''' '''[similar to adults]''' *** '''If SWL performed for total stone burden >20mm, placement of a ureteral stent or nephrostomy tube is recommended to prevent postoperative renal obstruction. [different than adults''', no indication for routine stent with SWL] === Open/laparoscopic/robotic surgery === * '''Except in cases of coexisting anatomic abnormalities, open/laparoscopic/robotic surgery for upper tract stones should not be routinely performed.''' * Series in adults have suggested that laparoscopic approaches may compare favorably to percutaneous techniques for large or staghorn renal stones, but in children, these approaches should be considered secondary or tertiary options for treatment of renal or ureteral stones since more conventional procedures, including SWL, URS, and PCNL, have high rates of success and lower risks of serious complications. * '''The primary exception to this statement is in the pediatric patient with one or more renal or ureteral stones and a co-existing anatomic anomaly, such as UPJ obstruction''', '''UVJ obstruction and duplication anomalies with an obstructed ectopic ureter.''' In such cases, open, laparoscopic, or robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is indicated to remove the stone(s) and repair the primary anatomic defect.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information