Editing
Pediatrics: Vesicoureteral Reflux
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Endoscopic === * '''A reasonable alternative for children being considered for surgical correction''' * '''Success rates vary across centers and that outcomes may not be durable.''' ** Higher success rates associated with: **# Volume of Dx/HA used **# Surgeon experience **# Volcano-shaped mound with no hydrodistention **# Utilization of the double hydrodistention-implantation technique **# Accurate needle entry point during endoscopic injection, as well as the needle placement *** Negative intraoperative cystogram is not associated with endoscopic success rates * '''Untreated BBD is associated with decreased resolution rates of VUR at initial follow-up in children treated with endoscopic surgery''' * The learning curve for endoscopic injection is believed to be different from that of open surgical reimplantation, but studies have compared these two approaches * Indications for treatment are the same as that of open surgical reimplantation * '''Materials used for endoscopic correction of reflux''' ** Characteristics of an ideal injectable biomaterial (4): **# Non-toxic and stable without migration to vital organs **# Cause minimal local inflammation, while at the same time be well encapsulated by normal fibrous tissue and fibrocytes **# Easy to inject through a long needle that passes easily through most standard endoscopic instruments **# Viscous enough to prevent leakage from the puncture site and maintain its injected volume and the mound shape after the normal process of exchange and excretion of any carrier molecules. ** '''Classified as particulate vs. degradable and autologous vs. non-autologous''' *** '''Disadvantage of particulate agents is risk of migration''' *** '''Disadvantage of degradable agents is less durability''' **** '''Deflux is biodegradable, the carrier gel is reabsorbed''', and the dextranomer microspheres become capsulated by fibroblast migration and collagen ingrowth **** '''DX/HA loses β23% of its volume beyond 3 months of follow-up''' *** '''Autologous Materials''' **** '''Fat, collagen, muscle, and chondrocytes have been evaluated as bulking agents''' * '''Follow-Up after Endoscopic Treatment''' ** '''The child is maintained on antibiotics for 3 months.''' ** '''US and VCUG are obtained at 3 months.''' *** '''If reflux is persistent, a repeat injection can be considered 6 months after the initial injection''' *** '''If there is still no resolution, open surgery is recommended.''' **** '''Most reports to date have not indicated any additional difficulty with open surgery after endoscopic correction using Deflux'''
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information