Editing
Prostate Cancer: Diagnosis and evaluation
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====== Potential roles of PSMA-PET imaging in prostate cancer ====== # '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer</span>''' #* '''<span style="color:#ff00ff">proPSMA (2020)</span>''' #**Objective: determine whether PSMA PET-CT prior to treatment in patient with high risk prostate cancer increases detection of metastases, compared to conventional imaging #**'''Population: 300 males with high-risk (PSA β₯20, grade group β₯3, or β₯cT3) prostate cancer being considered for radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy''' #**'''Randomized to Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT vs. conventional imaging (CT and bone scan), followed by second-line cross-over imaging.''' #***Second-line cross-over imaging was done within 14 days of baseline imaging, unless β₯3 distant metastases identified on first-line imaging. #***At 6 months, patients underwent repeat imaging as per randomised group with cross-over if #****Baseline imaging evidence of metastasis (N1 or M1) #****Biochemical or clinical suspicion of residual or recurrent disease. #***'''Primary outcome: accuracy (based on area under the curve (AUC)) of first-line imaging at identifying either pelvic nodal or distant metastatic disease, compared to assessment of metastases at 6 months (reference standard)''' #****Metastatic disease disease was defined by hard and soft criteria based on histopathologic, imaging, clinical, and biochemical findings. #***'''Results:''' #****'''Primary outcome: accuracy (based on AUC) significantly improved with PSMA PET-CT compared to conventional imaging (absolute difference: 27%, 92% PSMA PET-CT vs. 65% conventional imaging)''' #*****Sensitivity: 85% PSMA PET-CT vs. 38% conventional imaging #*****Specificity: 98% PSMA PET-CT vs. 91% conventional imaging #***** PSMA PET-CT more sensitive and specific than conventional imaging for both pelvic nodal or distant metastases #**** '''Secondary outcomes:''' #***** '''Change in management more common with PSMA PET-CT (28% PSMA PET-CT vs. 15% conventional imaging)''' #***** Less equivocal findings with PSMA PET-CT #***** Radiation exposure reduced with PSMA PET-CT (8 mSv PSMA PET-CT vs. 19 mSv conventional imaging) #*** Limitations: #****Lack of histopathological evidence of metastasis in majority of cases; unclear validity of reference standard used in this study #*****Only 23% of positive cases (pelvic nodal or distant metastasis) met "hard" criteria to define metastasis (true positive). #******Hard criteria were histopathology showing prostate adenocarcinoma, or change of a bone lesion to sclerotic or blastic on follow-up imaging. #*** [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32209449/ Hofman, Michael S., et al.] "Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study." ''The Lancet'' 395.10231 (2020): 1208-1216. #** '''Clinical implications (2):''' #**# '''PSMA PET/CT may identify nodes outside of the routine surgical field, as well as additional sites of distant disease''' #**# '''Sensitivity of PSMA PET/CT in detecting nodal disease not high enough to avoid treatment of lymph nodes''' in patients with risk of lymph node involvement # '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Improved quantification of metastatic burden</span>''' #* '''Oligometastatic disease may be identified, and such patients may be offered management in clinical trials or metastasis-directed surgery.''' # '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Staging of biochemical recurrence</span>''' #* '''Most common indication for PSMA-targeted PET''' #* '''Management of biochemical recurrence depends on disease extent:''' local recurrence of local recurrence with regional nodal metastases vs. distant metastatic disease # '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Determining patient suitability for PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy</span>''' #* '''Both 177Lu and 225Ac PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy are emerging as promising therapies for castration-resistant disease.''' # '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Primary detection of tumor as an adjunct to multiparametric MRI</span>''' #* Role of PSMA-targeted PET as an adjunct to mpMRI for primary detection of clinically significant prostate cancer is not well-established
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information