Editing
Functional: Female SUI
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====== Pubovaginal Sling Materials ====== * '''Options (4):''' *#'''Autologous''' *#'''Allograft''' *#'''Xenograft''' *#'''Synthetic''' *#* Although there is complete biocompatibility of the autologous sling and negligible urethral perforation, biologic graft and synthetic prosthetic materials have been increasingly used to decrease operative time, morbidity, pain, and hospital stay * '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Autologous fascia PVS''' ** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Gold standard for management of ALL forms of SUI''' ** '''Advantages compared to alternative sling materials (2):''' **# '''Minimal tissue inflammation''' **# '''Negligible risk of urethral erosion''' ** '''Disadvantages compared to alternative sling materials (4):''' *** '''Increased operative time, hospital stay''' ***'''Postoperative pain''' ***'''Risk of suprapubic wound seroma''' ***'''Risk of incisional hernia''' ** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Most commonly used autologous materials (2):''' **# '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Rectus abdominis fascia harvested from the abdominal wall''' **#* '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Most commonly used''' **# '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Fascia lata harvested from the lateral thigh''' **#* '''Fascia lata is the preferred autologous material for PVSs in patients with a history of prior ventral hernia repair;''' unlike rectus facia''',''' the recovery time is less and there is no risk of future abdominal hernia formation. **#* Disadvantages of fascia lata compared to rectus abdominis: **#*# Requires repositioning of the patient **#*# Increased operative time **#*# Operating in an area unfamiliar to most pelvic surgeons **# '''Rectus abdominis fascia vs. fascia lata PVS: similar improvement of SUI''' * '''Allograft PVS''' ** Were introduced in an effort to reduce overall morbidity, operative time, and pain related to graft procurement ** Currently derived from either cadaveric fascia lata or acellular human dermis ** Allografts from cadavers raise the concern of potentially transmitting illnesses such as HIV, hepatitis, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob prion disease *** The estimated risk of HIV transmission from an allograft is 1 in 1,667,600. *** The theoretical risk of developing Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease from a non-neural allograft is 1 in 3.5 million. ** '''Tissue-processing techniques for allografts may disrupt the microstructure and affect their strength properties''' *** '''Maximum load to failure, maximum load/graft width, and stiffness are significantly lower for the allograft freeze-dried fascia lata group compared with the autologous, solvent-dehydrated, and dermal graft groups''' * '''Xenograft PVS''' ** The forms of xenograft used are porcine dermis, porcine small intestinal submucosa, and bovine pericardium ** '''Less tensile strength''' than allograft in situ and '''highest propensity to encapsulate''' * '''Synthetic PVS''' ** '''The most commonly used synthetic material for PVSs is polypropylene mesh.''' ** '''Advantages:''' *** '''Almost unlimited supply''' of artificial graft material in various sizes and shapes, consistency in quality, '''elimination of harvest site complications''', and decreased operative time. *** More uniform, consistent, and durable compared with biologic grafts *** Sterile, biocompatible, and noncarcinogenic *** '''Lowest amount of degradation or disruption and the highest amount of fibroblast ingrowth and tissue ingrowth into the specimen''' ** '''Disadvantages''' *** '''Significant inflammatory and foreign body reactions''' *** '''Higher rates of graft infection, urinary tract perforation, and vaginal exposure''' **** '''No longer used to due risk of complications''' '''Patient counselling''' *If a synthetic prosthetic or biologic graft material is being used, surgeons should thoroughly counsel their patients about the permanent nature of these products and the unique and sometimes serious complications related to their use. *'''Risk of''' '''transient and permanent voiding dysfunction after surgery, including''' '''postoperative difficulty emptying the bladder and de novo urgency and frequency'''
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information