Editing
Management of Localized and Locally Advanced Disease
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== Indications ===== *<span style="color:#ff00ff">'''EORTC 30881'''</span> ** '''Objective: evaluate oncologic benefit of lymphadenectomy in cN0 disease''' ** '''Population: 772 patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for cT1-3, N0 suspected RCC''' ** '''Randomized to nephrectomy +/- LND''' ** '''Results:''' *** Only 4% of patients in the RN plus LND cohort had pN+ disease ****20% of patients with palpable nodes in RN plus LND group were N+ on final pathology; for patients without palpable nodes, 1% was pN+ ***'''No difference in overall survival, progression-free survival, or time to progression of disease''' *** While this is the only randomized trial to address this issue, concerns about EORTC 30881 include the relatively low risk of the patients randomized (≈70% of patients either T1 or T2) and many would be candidates for partial nephrectomy today. ** [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18848382/ Blom JH, van Poppel H, Maréchal JM, et al. Radical nephrectomy with and without lymph-node dissection: final results of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized phase 3 trial 30881. Eur Urol 2009;55:28–34.] * '''No randomized trials assessing the effect of lymphadenectomy for patients with cN+ disease.''' ** However, a subset of patients with regional lymph node metastases will be cured, or experience prolonged survival following surgery *2018 systematic review and meta-analysis **No benefit to LND for in either M0 or M1 RCC **Suggested that high-risk M0 patient groups warrant further study, as a subset of patients with isolated nodal metastases experience long‐term survival after surgical resection. ** [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29319926/ Bhindi, B, et al. "The role of lymph node dissection in the management of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis." BJU international 121.5 (2018): 684-698.] *'''Reasons for''' '''limited benefit of routine lymphadenectomy''' (3): *# RCC metastasizes through the bloodstream independent of the lymphatic system in many patients *# Lymphatic drainage of the kidney is highly variable. *## Even an extensive retroperitoneal dissection may not remove all possible sites of metastasis. *# Low overall incidence of lymph node disease (5%) ====== AUA ====== * '''2021 AUA''' ** '''cN+: recommended''' for clinically positive nodes (imaging or palpable surgical exploration), primarily for staging and prognostic purposes. ** '''cN0: does not routinely need to be performed''' for localized kidney cancer with clinically negative nodes ====== CUA ====== *'''2014 CUA''' ** '''cN0: not routinely recommended''' **'''cN1M0 disease''' ** '''Lymphadenectomy may be performed for diagnostic purposes in patients with cN1M1 disease''' ====== Other sources (8): ====== #'''Enlarged lymph nodes on imaging (cN+)''' #'''Cytoreductive surgery for metastatic disease''' #'''Tumor size > 10 cm''' #'''Nuclear grade 3 or 4''' #'''Sarcomatoid component''' #'''Tumor necrosis on imaging''' #'''Extrarenal tumor extension''' #'''Tumor thrombus''' #'''Direct tumoral invasion of adjacent organs''' * '''Regional lymphadenectomy should be considered in those patients who may have a reasonable chance of benefiting from the added surgery'''. ** Bulky lymphadenopathy carries a poor prognosis similar to metastatic disease, although surgical resection should be considered if feasible and if appropriate, given careful assessment of disease burden and patient age/comorbidities.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information