Editing
Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== Extent of lymphadenectomy ===== *'''<span style="color:#ff0000">When performing bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, at a minimum, the external and internal iliac and obturator lymph nodes should be removed[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28456635/ ★]</span>''' **'''To facilitate adequate staging, a standard lymphadenectomy''' (bilateral external iliac, internal iliac and obturator lymph nodes), at a minimum, '''needs to be completed with >12 lymph nodes evaluated''' **Submission of separate nodal packets appears to facilitate identification of lymph nodes and is associated with an increased number of reported lymph nodes ====== <span style="color:#ff00ff">SWOG S1011 (NEJM 2024) ====== * Population: 592 patients with localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer of clinical stage T2 (confined to muscle) to T4a (invading adjacent organs) with two or fewer positive nodes (N0, N1, or N2) * Randomized to: bilateral standard lymphadenectomy (dissection of lymph nodes on both sides of the pelvis) or extended lymphadenectomy involving removal of common iliac, presciatic, and presacral nodes. * Primary outcome: disease-free survival * Results: ** Median follow-up: 6.1 years ** Disease-free survival: no significant difference ** Overall survival: no significant difference ** Extended lymphadenectomy was associated with higher perioperative morbidity and mortality * Standard or Extended Lymphadenectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Lerner et al. NEJM 2024. ====== <span style="color:#ff00ff">LEA AUO AB 25/02 (European Urology 2019)</span> ====== * Population: 401 patients with locally resectable T1G3 or muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (T2-T4aM0) * '''Randomized to limited''' (obturator, and internal and external iliac nodes) '''vs. extended LND''' (in addition, deep obturator, common iliac, presacral, paracaval, interaortocaval, and para-aortal nodes up to the inferior mesenteric artery). * Primary outcome: recurrence-free survival * Secondary outcomes: cancer-specific survival, overall survival, complications * Results: ** Median number of dissected nodes: limited 19 vs. extended 31 ** '''Primary outcome: no significant difference in recurrence-free survival''' (5-yr RFS 65% extended vs 59%; p=0.36) ** Secondary outcomes: *** No significant difference in cancer-specific survival (5-yr CSS 76% vs 65%; p=0.10) *** No significant difference in overall survival (5-yr OS 59% vs 50%; p=0.12) *** Clavien grade ≥3 lymphoceles were more frequently reported in the extended LND group within 90 days after surgery. * [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30337060/ Gschwend, Jürgen E., et al.] "Extended versus limited lymph node dissection in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy: survival results from a prospective, randomized trial." European urology 75.4 (2019): 604-611.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information