Editing
Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cancer
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====== <span style="color:#ff0000">Primary treatment for low-grade UTUC</span> ====== *Effectiveness of intraluminal therapy has been limited by inadequate exposure to urothelium from fluid preparations due to rapid drainage from (2) **No storage capacity of UTUC (unlike bladder) **Ureteral and pelvic peristalsis *Potential solution is to use reverse thermosensitive polymers, which are liquid at room temperature and convert to a gel at body temperature, resulting in increased dwell time *'''<span style="color:#ff0000">UGN-101</span>''' **'''UGN-101 = MMC + reverse thermosensitive polymer''' ***Also known as Mitogel, Jelmyto **'''<span style="color:#ff00ff">OLYMPUS (Lancet Oncology 2020</span>''') *** Objective: evaluate the safety and activity of UGN-101 to treat primary and recurrent low-grade UTUC. *** '''Design: open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trial''' *** '''Population: 71 patients with primary or recurrent biopsy-proven, low-grade UTUC (involving the renal pelvis or calyces) and β₯1 low-grade lesion above the ureteropelvic junction, measuring 5β15 mm.''' **** Lesions >15 mm were eligible for endoscopic downsizing before the initiation of treatment. *** Treatment: 6 once-weekly treatments of UGN-101 *** '''Primary outcome: complete response,''' defined as **** Negative endoscopic examination AND **** Negative cytology at the primary disease evaluation AND **** Negative for-cause biopsy when done *** '''Results:''' **** '''Primary outcome:''' ***** '''β60% complete response at 3 months''' ****** Among those with complete response, β60% maintained complete response at 12 months[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34915741/] **** '''Adverse events''' ***** Common; 94% had any adverse event ***** 37% had β₯1 serious adverse event ****** '''44% ureteric stenosis[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34915741/]''' ****** 20% renal dysfunction *** [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32631491/ Kleinmann, Nir, et al.] "Primary chemoablation of low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma using UGN-101, a mitomycin-containing reverse thermal gel (OLYMPUS): an open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trial." ''The lancet oncology'' 21.6 (2020): 776-785. *'''Technique''' **'''Approaches:''' ***'''Antegrade via percutaneous nephrostomy''' *** '''Retrograde through a single J open-ended ureteric stent''' **** '''Suboptimal because the drug often does not reach the renal pelvis''' *** Both the antegrade and retrograde approach can be dangerous due to possible ureteric obstruction and consecutive pyelovenous influx during instillation/perfusion.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information