Editing
AUA: Early Detection of Prostate Cancer (2023)
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Tests to use in prostate cancer screening === *'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Use PSA as the first screening test</span>''' ** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Digital rectal exam (DRE)</span>''' ***'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Clinicians should not use DRE as the sole screening method.</span>''' ****'''The primary screening modality recommended for the early detection of prostate cancer is a PSA blood test.''' *** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Insufficient evidence to support adding DRE to PSA-based prostate cancer screening.</span>''' **** For various reasons, clinicians may choose to complement PSA screening with DRE based on SDM. **'''Stockholm-3 (STHLM-3)''' ***Multiplex test combining ****Clinical variables (age, first-degree family history of prostate cancer, and previous biopsy) ****Blood biomarkers (total PSA, free PSA, ratio of free to total PSA, hK2, MIC-1, and MSMB) ****Polygenic risk score (PRS) ***Has been evaluated as a first-line screening test for predicting the risk of GG2+ prostate cancers.[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26563502/] ****STHLM-3 found to have a higher predictive accuracy compared to PSA alone (area under the curve [AUC] 0.74 versus 0.56) and reduced unnecessary biopsies by 32% ****Further validation in diverse populations to confirm these findings will be necessary to move forward into practice. ** '''Polygenic risk score (PRS)''' ***Genetic tests used to predict a person’s risk of developing prostate cancer. ***Typically constructed as the weighted sum of a collection of genetic variants, usually single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) defined as single base-pair variations from the reference genome[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35251129/] ***Little evidence to mandate which SNP panel or PRS to use and where to threshold risk to create strata with different screening intensities. ***At the time of evidence review, no PRS tool has been shown to discriminate between aggressive and indolent prostate cancer risk
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information