Editing
Germ Cell Tumours
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== CSIA and IB NSGCT ===== * '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Options:</span>''' *# '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Surveillance</span>''' *# '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Adjuvant primary RPLND</span>''' *# '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Adjuvant primary chemotherapy (BEPx1-2)</span>''' *#* '''Newer guidelines, such as 2019 AUA guidelines, recommend 1 cycle for CSIA and 2 cycles for CSIB''' *#* '''2010 CUA Consensus Statement: BEPx2''' ** Long-term survival approaches 100% for each ** '''Guidelines''': *** '''2010 CUA Consensus Statement: surveillance preferred for all CSI NSGCT''' *** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">2019 AUA Guidelines:</span>''' **** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">CSIA NSGCT: surveillance recommended</span>''' **** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">CSIB NSGCT: all options are recommended</span>''' **** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">RPLND is recommended if there is any secondary somatic malignancy (e.g. rhabdomyosarcoma, adenocarcinoma, or primitive neuroectodermal tumor) in the primary tumor</span>''' * '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Surveillance for clinical stage I NSGCT</span>''' ** 70-80% of patients with clinical stage I seminoma achieve cure with radical orchiectomy alone ** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Risk factors for relapse on surveillance (2):</span>''' **# '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Pre-dominant embryonal carcinoma</span>''' **# '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Lymphovascular invasion</span>''' *** The definition of EC predominance in the literature varies from 45-90%. *** Other identified risk factors include advanced pT stage, absence of mature teratoma, absence of yolk sac tumor, presence of EC (regardless of the percent composition), percentage of MIB-1 staining, tumor size, and patient age. ** Surveillance protocol varies by institution, no consensus *** History and physical examination: every 2-3 months in year 1, every 2-4 months in year 2, every 4-6 months in year 3, and every 6-12 months for years 4 and 5 *** Serum tumor markers (AFP, hCG +/- LDH): every 2-3 months in year 1, every 2-4 months in year 2, every 4-6 months in year 3, and every 6-12 months for years 4 and 5 *** Radiologic assessment (chest x-ray and imaging of the abdomen with or without the pelvis): every 3-6 months in year 1 starting at 3 months, every 4-12 months in year 2, once in year 3, and once in year 4 or 5. **** Men at higher risk of relapse (e.g., lymphovascular invasion) should be imaged with shorter intervals. **** >90% of relapses occur within the first 2 years, but late relapses (>5 years) are seen in 1% of patients; after this time, annual serologic and radiographic assessment may be performed as indicated based upon clinical concerns. ***** Compared with NSGCT, surveillance for CS I seminoma is needed for a longer period because 10% to 20% of relapses occur 4 years or more after diagnosis. ** Patients who relapse on surveillance should be fully restaged and treated based on their TNM-s status. ** Early and late relapses have similar prognosis * '''Adjuvant primary RPLND''' ** Primary RPLND should be performed with curative (rather than staging) intent in all patients. ** Full, bilateral template dissection is associated with the lowest risk of abdominopelvic recurrence (<2%) and the highest rate of antegrade ejaculation (>90%) when nerve-sparing techniques are employed. ** A multi-center randomized trial comparing primary RPLND to chemotherapy for CS I found that chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk of relapse. The relapse rate after primary RPLND in this trial was 11%, higher than other published series, suggesting that RPLND should be performed in experienced centers. * '''Adjuvant primary chemotherapy''' ** BEP x 1-2 is typically used. ** Advantages (2): **# '''Highest relapse-free survival with any single treatment modality''' **# Can be delivered at community-based institutions ** Disadvantages (4): **# Does not treat retroperitoneal teratoma **# Long-term surveillance CT imaging of the retroperitoneum is required **# Potential risk of late toxicity (see below). **#* The risk of late toxicity from 2 cycles of chemotherapy is poorly defined, although there appears to be no safe lower limit. **# Exposes patients to the potential for chemoresistant and/or late relapse **#* Although primary chemotherapy is associated with the lowest risk of relapse, these relapses are less amenable to salvage therapy because they are chemoresistant, particularly if they have received a regimen other than standard dose BEP. In contrast, patients who relapse after RPLND or on surveillance are chemotherapy-naive and are cured with chemotherapy in virtually all cases.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information