Editing
Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== General principles === * '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Clinical trials should remain the first choice in patients with CRPC, whenever possible''' **Because any treatment for advanced disease remains non-curative, patients with advanced prostate cancer should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials.[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33556313/ §] * '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) should be continued for the remainder of a patient’s life, even during the course of subsequent therapies including chemotherapy''' ** Rationale (2): **#Androgen receptor remains active in most patients who have developed castration-resistant disease **# Almost all clinical trials that test novel therapies for men with CRPC mandate continued suppression of serum testosterone levels, either with chronic ADT or with surgical castration ** In patients who develop CRPC, the addition or change of first-generation androgen receptor antagonists (flutamide, bicalutamide, or nilutamide) may be considered.[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33556313/ §] *** Changing the anti-androgen or using corticosteroids with or without ketoconazole have been noted to cause transient PSA reductions in ≈30% of patients but have not been shown to improve any of the clinically meaningful outcome measures *** In patients treated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue monotherapy or those who have had an orchidectomy, the addition of androgen receptor antagonists, such as bicalutamide, can offer modest PSA responses that are short-lived in 30–35% of patients. ** For patients who have undergone total androgen blockade (combination of an AR-antagonist and an LHRH agonist), the androgen receptor antagonist should be discontinued to test for an anti-androgen withdrawal response.[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33556313/ §] *** Anti-androgen withdrawal phenomenon **** Patients treated with a combination of an AR-antagonist and an LHRH agonist can experience a decline in PSA and even in objective responses with the withdrawal of the anti-androgen from the combination. ***** Based on this response, it appears that the AR-antagonist is actually exerting agonistic activity on prostate cancer cells ***** 15-30% of patients may have PSA declines of > 50% after antiandrogen withdrawal, and the declines have a median duration of 3.5 to 5 months. ***** Objective, measurable tumor responses are observed less commonly ***** Overall survival is not improved in those patients demonstrating the antiandrogen withdrawal phenomenon compared to those who have not.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information