Editing
Biochemical Recurrence
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Imaging ==== * '''Local failure''' ** '''MRI''' *** '''Useful even in low PSA values''' *** Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 98%, 94%, and 93%, respectively, in identifying local recurrence after RP when validated by PSA level decrease after external beam radiotherapy and had sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100%, 97%, and 91% when validated by ultrasound-guided biopsy§ **'''Novel PET-CT imaging''' ***See below; also used to evaluate distant failure * '''Distant failure''' **'''Median PSA at the time of a newly detected bone metastasis''' '''is 32 ng/mL''' in hormone therapy–naive men after radical prostatectomy, *** ≈25% of those metastases occurred at PSA < 10 ng/mL. ** '''"<span style="color:#ff0000">Conventional" imaging: CT scan and bone scan</span>''' *** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Diagnostic yield is significantly influenced by the PSA level</span>''' **** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Limited if PSA < 10 ng/mL; very limited if PSA 0.2-1 ng/mL</span>''' *** '''CT scan''' **** Advantage ***** Good at detecting nodal and visceral metastases **** Disadvantage ***** Bone metastases are difficult to detect **** Meta-analysis (2004) **** 25 studies evaluating prostate cancer staging **** Results: ***** Detection of lymph node metastasis on CT scan based on PSA: ****** <20 ng/mL: 0% ****** >20 ng/mL: 1.1% **** Abuzallouf, Sadeq, Ian Dayes, and Himu Lukka."Baseline staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer: a summary of the literature." ''The Journal of urology'' 171.6 Part 1 (2004): 2122-2127. *** '''Bone scan''' **** Time consuming (3 - 4 hours) **** Costs: 600-1000$ USD **** Advantage ***** Good at detecting bone metastases **** Disadvantage ***** Limited sensitivity at detecting bone metastases with low PSA **** Meta-analysis (2004) **** 23 studies evaluating prostate cancer staging **** Results: ***** Detection of bone metastasis on bone scan based on PSA: ****** < 10 ng/mL: 2.3% ****** ≥10 - 20 ng/mL≤l: 5.3% ****** >20 - 49.9 ng/mL: 16.2% **** Abuzallouf, Sadeq, Ian Dayes, and Himu Lukka."Baseline staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer: a summary of the literature." ''The Journal of urology'' 171.6 Part 1 (2004): 2122-2127. ** '''Novel PET-CT imaging'''§ *** See Prostate Cancer: Diagnosis and Evaluation Chapter Notes *** '''Advantage over conventional imaging''' **** '''Higher sensitivity for the detection of prostate cancer recurrence and metastases at low PSA values (<2.0ng/mL).''' *** '''FDA approved after biochemical recurrence to evaluate for role of locoregional salvage treatment''' *** '''2021 CUA Best Practice Report: may be helpful after biochemical recurrence to evaluate for role of locoregional salvage treatment§''' ** '''Newer generation prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) antibodies''' '''are promising for both prostate cancer detection and potential therapy.'''
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UrologySchool.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
UrologySchool.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Clinical Tools
Guidelines
Chapters
Landmark Studies
Videos
Contribute
For Patients & Families
MediaWiki
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information