Bladder Cancer: Pathology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Urology4all (talk | contribs) |
Urology4all (talk | contribs) |
||
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Bladder Cancer]] | [[Category:Bladder Cancer]] | ||
== | == Common Malignant Bladder Cancer Histology == | ||
*'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Urothelial carcinoma</span>''' | *'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Urothelial carcinoma</span>''' | ||
**Most common bladder cancer histology | **'''Most common (90%) bladder cancer histology''' | ||
*'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Squamous cell carcinoma</span>''' | *'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Non-urothelial carcinoma</span>''' | ||
**Second most common bladder cancer histology | **'''See [[Non-Urothelial Bladder Cancer|Non-Urothelial Bladder Cancer Chapter]]''' | ||
*'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Adenocarcinoma</span>''' | **'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Squamous cell carcinoma</span>''' | ||
*'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Others</span>''' | ***'''Second most common bladder cancer histology''' | ||
**'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Small cell</span>''' | ****2-5% of all bladder cancers | ||
**'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Primary Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma</span>''' | **'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Adenocarcinoma</span>''' | ||
**'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Others</span>''' | |||
***'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Small cell</span>''' | |||
***'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Primary Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma</span>''' | |||
== Urothelial Carcinoma == | |||
* '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Accounts for 90% of bladder | * '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Accounts for 90% of all bladder cancers</span>''' | ||
* '''The term "urothelial cancer" is preferable to the term transitional cell cancer''' | * '''The term "urothelial cancer" is preferable to the term transitional cell cancer''' | ||
=== Grading === | |||
* '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Classified as low grade (LG) vs. high grade (HG)</span>''' | * '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Classified as low grade (LG) vs. high grade (HG)</span>''' | ||
** 1973 World Health Organization defined 3 categories: grades 1, 2, and 3 | ** 1973 World Health Organization defined 3 categories: grades 1, 2, and 3 | ||
Line 32: | Line 33: | ||
** The variance in biologic behavior for LG versus HG lesions correlates with the known dual molecular lines of genetic development for these two pathways and supports the concept that HG and LG cancers may be considered as essentially different diseases; LG papillary tumors tend to exhibit relatively few chromosomal abnormalities compared to HG tumors | ** The variance in biologic behavior for LG versus HG lesions correlates with the known dual molecular lines of genetic development for these two pathways and supports the concept that HG and LG cancers may be considered as essentially different diseases; LG papillary tumors tend to exhibit relatively few chromosomal abnormalities compared to HG tumors | ||
=== CIS === | |||
* A flat, non-invasive urothelial carcinoma | * A flat, non-invasive urothelial carcinoma | ||
* '''HG by definition and is regarded as a precursor to the development of invasive HG cancer''' | * '''HG by definition and is regarded as a precursor to the development of invasive HG cancer''' | ||
Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
** Primary: no previous history of bladder cancer (best prognosis) | ** Primary: no previous history of bladder cancer (best prognosis) | ||
** Secondary: new lesion diagnosed during follow-up | ** Secondary: new lesion diagnosed during follow-up | ||
Dysplasia | |||
=== Dysplasia === | |||
* Good indication of urothelial instability and a marker of recurrence and progression in those with known urothelial cancer | * Good indication of urothelial instability and a marker of recurrence and progression in those with known urothelial cancer | ||
=== Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential === | |||
* Also known as PUNMLP | * Also known as PUNMLP | ||
*'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Essentially benign tumour</span> with orderly cellular arrangement, minimal architectural abnormalities, and minimal nuclear atypia''' | *'''<span style="color:#ff0000">Essentially benign tumour</span> with orderly cellular arrangement, minimal architectural abnormalities, and minimal nuclear atypia''' | ||
Line 50: | Line 53: | ||
** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Follow-up is warranted</span>''' | ** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Follow-up is warranted</span>''' | ||
*** '''Usually the new tumours are of similar histology, but occasionally these subsequent lesions manifest as urothelial carcinoma''' | *** '''Usually the new tumours are of similar histology, but occasionally these subsequent lesions manifest as urothelial carcinoma''' | ||
*** '''Should be followed similarly to low-grade tumors''' | *** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Should be followed similarly to low-grade tumors</span>''' | ||
* '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Progression is rare (4%)</span>''' | * '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Progression is rare (4%)</span>''' | ||
=== Histologic variants of urothelial cancer === | |||
* 75% of urothelial carcinomas are classified as pure, while 25% have a secondary histological variant | * '''75% of urothelial carcinomas are classified as pure, while 25% have a secondary histological variant''' | ||
* Squamous | * Squamous | ||
** Most common (20-40%) | ** Most common (20-40%) | ||
Line 83: | Line 86: | ||
** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Not associated with worse prognosis</span>''' | ** '''<span style="color:#ff0000">Not associated with worse prognosis</span>''' | ||
* '''Adenocarcinoma differentiation''' | * '''Adenocarcinoma differentiation''' | ||
== Questions == | == Questions == | ||
# | # | ||
== Answers == | == Answers == | ||
# | # | ||
== Next Chapter: | == Next Chapter: [[Bladder Cancer: TNM Staging|TNM Staging]] == | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
Line 193: | Line 101: | ||
* Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Peters CA (eds): CAMPBELL-WALSH UROLOGY, ed 11. Philadelphia, Elsevier, 2015, chap 92 | * Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Peters CA (eds): CAMPBELL-WALSH UROLOGY, ed 11. Philadelphia, Elsevier, 2015, chap 92 | ||
* Bhindi, Bimal, et al. "Canadian Urological Association guideline on the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer." ''Canadian Urological Association Journal'' 15.8 (2021). | * Bhindi, Bimal, et al. "Canadian Urological Association guideline on the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer." ''Canadian Urological Association Journal'' 15.8 (2021). | ||
*Flaig, Thomas W., et al. "Bladder cancer, version 2.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology." |
Latest revision as of 19:10, 17 March 2024
Common Malignant Bladder Cancer Histology[edit | edit source]
- Urothelial carcinoma
- Most common (90%) bladder cancer histology
- Non-urothelial carcinoma
- See Non-Urothelial Bladder Cancer Chapter
- Squamous cell carcinoma
- Second most common bladder cancer histology
- 2-5% of all bladder cancers
- Second most common bladder cancer histology
- Adenocarcinoma
- Others
- Small cell
- Primary Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma
Urothelial Carcinoma[edit | edit source]
- Accounts for 90% of all bladder cancers
- The term "urothelial cancer" is preferable to the term transitional cell cancer
Grading[edit | edit source]
- Classified as low grade (LG) vs. high grade (HG)
- 1973 World Health Organization defined 3 categories: grades 1, 2, and 3
- Middle category was overreported
- 2004, International Society of Urologic Pathologists updated classification to 3 categories:
- Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP)
- Low-grade
- High-grade
- 2016 reviewed system without major changes
- With the 2004/2016 WHO/ISUP system, 30-40% of the former grade 2 lesions with bland cytological features were re-classified as LG, while the other 60-70% were re-classified as HG
- TaLG lesions recur at a rate of 50-70% and progress in ≈5% of patients
- T1HG lesions recur at a rate > 80% and progress in 50% of patients [different numbers than Chapter 93]
- The variance in biologic behavior for LG versus HG lesions correlates with the known dual molecular lines of genetic development for these two pathways and supports the concept that HG and LG cancers may be considered as essentially different diseases; LG papillary tumors tend to exhibit relatively few chromosomal abnormalities compared to HG tumors
- 1973 World Health Organization defined 3 categories: grades 1, 2, and 3
CIS[edit | edit source]
- A flat, non-invasive urothelial carcinoma
- HG by definition and is regarded as a precursor to the development of invasive HG cancer
- Lesions interpreted as severe dysplasia or severe atypia are regarded as being the same entity as CIS
- Rarely found in isolation; majority (90%) found in association with papillary or nodular bladder tumours
- Considered a field disease, as it can affect multiple areas in the bladder, the upper urinary tract, and the urethra
- Classified as
- Primary: no previous history of bladder cancer (best prognosis)
- Secondary: new lesion diagnosed during follow-up
Dysplasia[edit | edit source]
- Good indication of urothelial instability and a marker of recurrence and progression in those with known urothelial cancer
Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential[edit | edit source]
- Also known as PUNMLP
- Essentially benign tumour with orderly cellular arrangement, minimal architectural abnormalities, and minimal nuclear atypia
- Recurs within the bladder in 12-35% of patients
- Post-operative treatment with mitomycin C is warranted
- Follow-up is warranted
- Usually the new tumours are of similar histology, but occasionally these subsequent lesions manifest as urothelial carcinoma
- Should be followed similarly to low-grade tumors
- Progression is rare (4%)
Histologic variants of urothelial cancer[edit | edit source]
- 75% of urothelial carcinomas are classified as pure, while 25% have a secondary histological variant
- Squamous
- Most common (20-40%)
- Urothelial with squamous differentiation outcomes similar to pure urothelial
- Glandular
- Second most common (20%)
- Urothelial with glandular differentiation outcomes similar to pure urothelial
- Sarcomatoid
- Aggressive; consider upfront cystectomy
- Plasmacytoid
- Aggressive; consider upfront cystectomy
- Usually manifests at an advanced stage
- Respond very poorly to systemic chemotherapy
- Median survival < 27 months from time of diagnosis
- Aggressive; consider upfront cystectomy
- Micropapillary
- Aggressive; consider upfront cystectomy
- High (≈70%) progression rate from NMIBC to MIBC with a high subsequent metastatic rate despite treatment; usually manifests at an advanced stage
- Cancer-specific survival <22% at 4 years despite aggressive chemotherapy and surgical resection in patients with locally advanced disease
- The most effective treatment for all stages of micropapillary urothelial carcinoma is surgical resection.
- Treatment with transurethral resection and BCG therapy is ineffective unless the tumor is completely resected
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not appear effective in micropapillary urothelial carcinoma, and may actually worsen survival by delaying therapy when compared with immediate cystectomy.
- Aggressive; consider upfront cystectomy
- Nested
- Rare
- Associated with higher stage and nodal invasion
- Oncological outcomes comparable to patients with pure urothelial carcinoma when matched by stage in both the NMIBC and MIBC setting
- Can be confused with benign lesions, such as Von Brunn nests that are in the lamina propria, cystitis cystica, and inverted papillomas
- Clear cell variant of urothelial carcinoma
- Not associated with worse prognosis
- Adenocarcinoma differentiation
Questions[edit | edit source]
Answers[edit | edit source]
Next Chapter: TNM Staging[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Peters CA (eds): CAMPBELL-WALSH UROLOGY, ed 11. Philadelphia, Elsevier, 2015, chap 92
- Bhindi, Bimal, et al. "Canadian Urological Association guideline on the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer." Canadian Urological Association Journal 15.8 (2021).
- Flaig, Thomas W., et al. "Bladder cancer, version 2.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology."