Suture Materials: Difference between revisions

From UrologySchool.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 122: Line 122:
***Similar needle in Covidien: V-20
***Similar needle in Covidien: V-20
**RB-1: taper, 1/2 circle, 17mm
**RB-1: taper, 1/2 circle, 17mm
***Similar needle in CV-23: V-20
***Similar needle in Covidien: CV-23
**UR-6: taper, 5/8 circle, 26mm
**UR-6: taper, 5/8 circle, 26mm
*Covidien
*Covidien
** Urology needles are available as taper point and 5/8 circle, with lengths of 27 mm (GU-46 and HGU-46), 37 mm (GU-45) and 40 mm (GU-44).[https://www.medtronic.com/covidien/en-gb/products/wound-closure/suture-needles.html#]
** Urology needles are available as taper point and 5/8 circle, with lengths of 27 mm (GU-46 and HGU-46), 37 mm (GU-45) and 40 mm (GU-44).[https://www.medtronic.com/covidien/en-gb/products/wound-closure/suture-needles.html#]
== Techniques ==
* [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2966262/ Knotting Looped Polydiaxone During Abdominal Wound Closure]


== References ==
== References ==

Latest revision as of 17:52, 12 October 2023

Classification[edit | edit source]

  • Based on
    1. Absorbable vs. non-absorbable
    2. Braided (multifilament) vs. monofilament
    3. Synthetic vs. natural
  • Absorbable vs. non-absorbable
    • Non-absorbable
      • Advantage
        • Longer mechanical support
      • Disadvantage
        • Nidus for stone formation in urinary tract
  • Braided (multifilament) vs. monofilament
    • Monofilament
      • Advantages
        1. Less tissue dragging and tearing
        2. Less tissue reaction
        3. Reduces spread of wound infection since does not provide capillary wicking of fluids
  • Synthetic vs. natural
    • Synthetic
      • Advantages
        • Less tissue reaction

Absorbable[edit | edit source]

  • Monofilament
    • Catgut
      • Natural
      • Majority based on type I collagen
      • Extracted from the intestines of sheep or goats
      • Two types: plain vs. chromic
        • Chromic
          • Treated with chrome salts (brown colour) which slows absorption time and reduces tissue reaction
      • Completely absorbed within ≈70-90 days
      • Time to 50% breaking strength retention: 3-4 weeks§
      • Advantages
        1. High elasticity
        2. Good tensile strength
          • Plain catgut: 7 days
          • Chromic catgut: 14 days
      • Disadvantages
        1. Poor knot security
        2. Tissue reaction (due to foreign protein nature of catgut suture)
          • Plain catgut has more tissue reaction than chromic catgut
    • Monocryl
      • Also known as poliglecaprone
      • Synthetic
      • Completely absorbed within ≈90-120 days§
      • Identical knot performance compared with Vicryl, similar performance to PDS, and lesser performance compared with Maxon
      • High initial breaking strength, being superior to chronic gut, Vicryl, and PDS
      • Time to 50% breaking strength retention: 1 week§
      • Advantages§
        • Pliability, minimal force required to bend
        • Less out-of-package memory than maxon and PDS
    • Maxon
      • Also known as polyglyconate
      • Synthetic
      • Completely absorbed within ≈100 days
    • Biosyn (Covidien)
      • Synthetic
      • Completely absorbed within ≈90-110 days§
    • PDS (Ethicon)
      • Also known as polydioxanone
      • Synthetic
      • Completely absorbed within ≈200 days
      • Enhanced version (PDS II) has improved flexibility and handling characteristics
  • Braided
    • Vicryl (Ethicon)/Polysorb (Covidien)
      • Also known as polyglactin
      • Synthetic
      • Completely absorbed within ≈60 days
      • Time to 50% breaking strength retention: 3 weeks§
    • Dexon (Covidien)
      • Also known as polyglycolic acid

Non-absorbable[edit | edit source]

  • Monofilament
    • Nylon
      • Natural
    • Prolene
      • Synthetic
  • Braided
    • Silk
      • Natural

Clinical implications[edit | edit source]

  • Closure of urinary tract wounds§
    • Wounds of the urinary bladder wall regain strength equal to unwounded bladder wall within 21 days, based on animal studies§
      • Wounds of stomach and colon do not achieve more than 70 per cent of unwounded tissue strength after 120 days§
    • Braded, synthetic absorbale sutures (polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) and polyglycolic acid (Dexon)) should be used in the absence of infection
      • Braded, synthetic absorbable sutures are absorbed by nonenzymatic hydrolysis in a predictable manner with limited inflammatory response while gut sutures have an unpredictable absorption rate by enzymatic degradation and elicit an exaggerated inflammatory response
      • In the presence of infection, use absorbable natural fiber suture e.g. Catgut
        • Proteus species, accelerates the degradation of absorbable synthetic sutures to a greater degree than Catgut suture
      • Nonabsorbable sutures or staples should not be used in the urinary tract because predictably promote urolithiasis.
  • Bladder closure§
    • 2-layered closure
      • Close mucosal layers with 3-0 Vicryl in running manner
      • Close detrusor/serosal layers with 2-0 Vicryl in running manner
  • Ureteroureterostomy
    • 4-0 to 6-0 suture

Needles[edit | edit source]

  • Characteristics to consider
    • Point
      • Taper vs. cutting
    • Circle
      • 1/2
      • 3/8
      • 5/8
    • Length
      • 26 mm
      • 36 mm
      • 40 mm
  • Common needles
    • CT-1 (Ethicon): taper, 1/2 circle, 36mm
      • Similar needle in Covidien: GS-21
    • SH: taper, 1/2 circle, 26mm
      • Similar needle in Covidien: V-20
    • RB-1: taper, 1/2 circle, 17mm
      • Similar needle in Covidien: CV-23
    • UR-6: taper, 5/8 circle, 26mm
  • Covidien
    • Urology needles are available as taper point and 5/8 circle, with lengths of 27 mm (GU-46 and HGU-46), 37 mm (GU-45) and 40 mm (GU-44).[1]

Techniques[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  • Rose, Jessica, and Faiz Tuma."Sutures And Needles." StatPearls [Internet] (2020).
  • Chu, C. C. Biotextiles as medical implants: 11. Materials for absorbable and nonabsorbable surgical sutures. Elsevier Inc. Chapters, 2013.
  • Edlich, Richard F., George T. Rodeheaver, and John G. Thacker. "Considerations in the choice of sutures for wound closure of the genitourinary tract." The Journal of urology 137.3 (1987): 373-379