AUA: Incontinence after Prostate Therapy (2019): Difference between revisions
Urology4all (talk | contribs) |
Urology4all (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
* '''Patients with urgency urinary incontinence or urgency predominant mixed urinary incontinence should be offered treatment options per the AUA OAB guidelines''' | * '''Patients with urgency urinary incontinence or urgency predominant mixed urinary incontinence should be offered treatment options per the AUA OAB guidelines''' | ||
=== | === Non-surgical === | ||
==== | ==== Options ==== | ||
# '''PFME/PFMT''' | # '''PFME/PFMT''' | ||
# '''Absorbent pads''' | # '''Absorbent pads''' | ||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
*** '''Suprapubic catheter drainage is not a solution for the patient with severe intrinsic sphincter deficiency, as urethral leakage will persist''' | *** '''Suprapubic catheter drainage is not a solution for the patient with severe intrinsic sphincter deficiency, as urethral leakage will persist''' | ||
=== Surgical === | |||
==== Timing ==== | |||
* '''If there is no improvement at 6 months despite conservative therapy and the patient has bothersome IPT,''' (i.e. patient does not want to wait until 12 month time point) '''surgery may be considered for early treatment''' | * '''If there is no improvement at 6 months despite conservative therapy and the patient has bothersome IPT,''' (i.e. patient does not want to wait until 12 month time point) '''surgery may be considered for early treatment''' | ||
** While almost all patients have reached their maximum improvement by 12 months, most patients with severe SUI will show no significant improvement after 6 months and may be candidates for early intervention | ** While almost all patients have reached their maximum improvement by 12 months, most patients with severe SUI will show no significant improvement after 6 months and may be candidates for early intervention | ||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
** '''Conversely, treatment should be offered with caution in some patients who continue to display symptom improvement at 12 months''' | ** '''Conversely, treatment should be offered with caution in some patients who continue to display symptom improvement at 12 months''' | ||
==== Pre-surgical Evaluation ==== | |||
# '''SUI should be confirmed''' by history, physical exam, or ancillary testing | # '''SUI should be confirmed''' by history, physical exam, or ancillary testing | ||
#* If there is any doubt as to whether the patient has SUI; all reasonable measures to '''demonstrate SUI on physical exam''', with or without provocative testing such as bending, shifting position, or rising from seated to standing position, should be taken | #* If there is any doubt as to whether the patient has SUI; all reasonable measures to '''demonstrate SUI on physical exam''', with or without provocative testing such as bending, shifting position, or rising from seated to standing position, should be taken | ||
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
#*** Up to 35% of males with post-prostatectomy SUI will not demonstrate SUI with a catheter in place. This may be due to some scarring at the site of the anastomosis. In such cases, even a small catheter can occlude the urethra and prevent stress leakage. | #*** Up to 35% of males with post-prostatectomy SUI will not demonstrate SUI with a catheter in place. This may be due to some scarring at the site of the anastomosis. In such cases, even a small catheter can occlude the urethra and prevent stress leakage. | ||
==== Contraindications ==== | |||
* '''It is not known if poor bladder compliance and an uncorrected storage pressure are absolute contraindications to SUI surgery in IPT patients (***Campbell's lists this as contraindication***). However, these patients should be carefully followed to avoid upper tract decompensation.''' | * '''It is not known if poor bladder compliance and an uncorrected storage pressure are absolute contraindications to SUI surgery in IPT patients (***Campbell's lists this as contraindication***). However, these patients should be carefully followed to avoid upper tract decompensation.''' | ||
==== Options (5): ==== | |||
# '''Urethral bulking agents''' | # '''Urethral bulking agents''' | ||
# '''Adjustable balloon devices''' | # '''Adjustable balloon devices''' | ||
Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
* Risks, benefits, and expectations of different treatments should be discussed using the shared decision-making model | * Risks, benefits, and expectations of different treatments should be discussed using the shared decision-making model | ||
===== Urethral bulking agents ===== | |||
* '''Least invasive technique''' | * '''Least invasive technique''' | ||
* '''Least effective surgical technique; cure is rare''' | * '''Least effective surgical technique; cure is rare''' | ||
* '''Consider in patients who are unable to tolerate or refuse more invasive surgical therapy''' | * '''Consider in patients who are unable to tolerate or refuse more invasive surgical therapy''' | ||
===== Adjustable balloon devices ===== | |||
* '''Consider for mild SUI''' | * '''Consider for mild SUI''' | ||
* '''Disadvantages: increased incidence of intraoperative complications and need for explanation within the first 2 years compared to the male sling and AUS''' | * '''Disadvantages: increased incidence of intraoperative complications and need for explanation within the first 2 years compared to the male sling and AUS''' | ||
===== Male slings ===== | |||
* '''Considered for mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence''' | * '''Considered for mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence''' | ||
** '''Poor efficacy in comparison to an AUS in patients with severe incontinence.''' | ** '''Poor efficacy in comparison to an AUS in patients with severe incontinence.''' | ||
Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
*** If a male sling is thought to be infected or documented to be eroded on cystoscopy, the '''management is similar to management of an infected or eroded AUS (see below)''' | *** If a male sling is thought to be infected or documented to be eroded on cystoscopy, the '''management is similar to management of an infected or eroded AUS (see below)''' | ||
====== | ===== AUS ===== | ||
* '''Consider for mild to severe stress urinary incontinence''' | |||
====== Indications ====== | |||
*'''Consider for mild to severe stress urinary incontinence''' | |||
* '''Preferred in patients with prior (3):''' | * '''Preferred in patients with prior (3):''' | ||
** '''Radiation''' | ** '''Radiation''' | ||
Line 157: | Line 159: | ||
** '''Vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis or bladder neck contracture''' | ** '''Vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis or bladder neck contracture''' | ||
*** Decreased success rates when undergoing male slings | *** Decreased success rates when undergoing male slings | ||
====== Urinary diversion | ====== Contraindications ====== | ||
* '''Inadequate physical or cognitive abilities to operate the device''' | |||
====== Procedure ====== | |||
* '''Single cuff perineal approach is preferred, superior outcomes compared to transverse scrotal incision''' | |||
====== '''Complications''' ====== | |||
* '''Intraoperative urethral injury''' | |||
** '''If identified during implantation, procedure should be abandoned and subsequent implantation should be delayed''' | |||
* '''Persistent leakage''' | |||
* '''Mechanical failure''' | |||
* '''Cuff erosion''' | |||
** Can be due to unrecognized urethral injury at the time of initial surgery or more likely due to subsequent instrumentation of the urethra including catheterization. | |||
** '''Management:''' | |||
*** '''AUS explant with the urethral catheter left in place for a few weeks to allow the urethral defect to heal''' | |||
*** '''AUS should not be re-implanted until at least 3 months''' | |||
* '''Infection''' | |||
** '''Device infection occurs in <1-5% of cases''' | |||
** '''Presents with pain at the site of the AUS, fever, scrotal warmth or erythema, or skin changes''' | |||
** '''Management:''' | |||
*** '''Urgent AUS explantation''' | |||
*** '''AUS should not be reimplanted until at least 3 months''' to allow the infection to clear and inflammation to subside. | |||
* '''Decreased efficacy over time and reoperations are common''' | |||
** '''The current version consists of''' a hydraulic system composed of '''3 separate parts:''' | |||
**# '''A urethral cuff''' of varying sizes | |||
**# '''A pressure regulating balloon reservoir''' with three available pressure profiles | |||
**# '''A control pump''' | |||
*** The device will fail if any of the 3 parts, the tubing, or connections suffer a micro-perforation with loss of fluid | |||
** The rate of device failure increases with time, with '''failure rates of''' | |||
*** '''≈24% at 5 years''' | |||
*** '''≈ 50% at 10 years''' | |||
** '''An AUS might need to be replaced over time due to persistent or recurrent incontinence generally due to:''' | |||
**# '''Urethral atrophy''' | |||
**# '''Improper cuff sizing''' | |||
**# '''Partial fluid loss''' | |||
===== Urinary diversion ===== | |||
* '''Can be considered in appropriately motivated and counseled patients who are unable to obtain adequate long-term quality of life''' | * '''Can be considered in appropriately motivated and counseled patients who are unable to obtain adequate long-term quality of life''' | ||
** '''If bladder preservation is feasible, conversion to a Mitrofanoff (e.g. Appendix, Monti), incontinent ileovesicostomy, or suprapubic tube with bladder neck closure may confer an improved QoL.''' | ** '''If bladder preservation is feasible, conversion to a Mitrofanoff (e.g. Appendix, Monti), incontinent ileovesicostomy, or suprapubic tube with bladder neck closure may confer an improved QoL.''' | ||
** '''In the event of the “hostile” bladder, cystectomy in combination with either an ileal conduit or continent catheterizable pouch''' would best manage incontinence while protecting the upper tracts. | ** '''In the event of the “hostile” bladder, cystectomy in combination with either an ileal conduit or continent catheterizable pouch''' would best manage incontinence while protecting the upper tracts. | ||
===== Other ===== | |||
* Other potential treatments for IPT should be considered investigational | * Other potential treatments for IPT should be considered investigational | ||